POLS 6386 MEASUREMENT THEORY
Tenth Assignment
Due 8 April 2003


Respondent
1 2 "Roll Call 1-2"
WALLACE 50 60 6
HUMPHREY 97 97 0
NIXON 85 65 1
MCCARTHY 60 70 6
REAGAN 40 30 1
ROCKEFELLER 40 40 0
LBJ 75 97 6
ROMNEY 30 50 6
R.KENNEDY 80 97 6
MUSKIE 60 97 6
AGNEW 40 50 6
LEMAY 30 60 6
Continuing this process for all unique pairs of respondents produces a
"roll call" matrix of 12 by 890,445 for the 1968 Thermometer data. For 2000,
the "roll call" matrix is 14 by 1,069,453. This
process is discussed in more detail in the assigned reading
Non-Parametric Analysis of Binary Choice Data. Note
that, ignoring the abstentions -- the "0"s -- there are only 212 or
4,096
unique patterns of "roll calls" for the 1968 Thermometer data. For
2000, there are only 214 or 16,384
unique patterns of "roll calls." 29 MARCH 2003 15.26.47.00.
RANDOM NUMBER SEED 76200
\OLDTIME\VOTE_THERM_1968_RESP.ORD
NON-PARAMETRIC MULTIDIMENSIONAL UNFOLDING OF THERMOMETER DATA
221000 10 36 2
(36A1,100(3900I1))
(I5,1X,36A1,2I5,50F8.3)
******************************************************************************
1 ROLL CALLS 2 16742 188987 0.08859 0.91141 0.73734 0.00000
LEGISLATORS 2 16855 188987 0.08919 0.91081 0.73557 0.00000
2 ROLL CALLS 2 16712 188987 0.08843 0.91157 0.73781 0.99719
LEGISLATORS 2 16716 188987 0.08845 0.91155 0.73775 1.00000
3 ROLL CALLS 2 16694 188987 0.08833 0.91167 0.73809 0.99775
LEGISLATORS 2 16701 188987 0.08837 0.91163 0.73798 1.00000
4 ROLL CALLS 2 16687 188987 0.08830 0.91170 0.73820 0.99833
LEGISLATORS 2 16696 188987 0.08834 0.91166 0.73806 1.00000
5 ROLL CALLS 2 16686 188987 0.08829 0.91171 0.73822 0.99844
LEGISLATORS 2 16697 188987 0.08835 0.91165 0.73805 1.00000
6 ROLL CALLS 2 16683 188987 0.08828 0.91172 0.73826 0.99859
LEGISLATORS 2 16690 188987 0.08831 0.91169 0.73816 1.00000
7 ROLL CALLS 2 16683 188987 0.08828 0.91172 0.73826 0.99876
LEGISLATORS 2 16686 188987 0.08829 0.91171 0.73822 1.00000
8 ROLL CALLS 2 16682 188987 0.08827 0.91173 0.73828 0.99830
LEGISLATORS 2 16688 188987 0.08830 0.91170 0.73819 1.00000
9 ROLL CALLS 2 16682 188987 0.08827 0.91173 0.73828 0.99846
LEGISLATORS 2 16682 188987 0.08827 0.91173 0.73828 1.00000
10 ROLL CALLS 2 16132 188987 0.08536 0.91464 0.74691 0.99795
LEGISLATORS 2 16136 188987 0.08538 0.91462 0.74685 1.00000
MEAN VOLUME LEG. 0.0020 0.0000 1.0000 0.0000 0.0000
MACHINE PREC. 2 16133 188987 0.08537 0.91463
15.26.47.03.
ELAPSED TIME OF JOB 15.34.16.51.
Turn in your PERF21.DAT file. 29 MARCH 2003 15.26.47.00.
1 WALLACE 102917027 0.940 0.002 0.674 -0.297
2 HUMPHREY 99817534 0.943 0.002 -0.607 0.398
3 NIXON 193117642 0.891 0.002 0.389 0.263
4 MCCARTHY 128315966 0.920 0.002 -0.162 -0.936
5 REAGAN 199215712 0.873 0.002 0.392 0.122
6 ROCKEFELLER 106715510 0.931 0.002 -0.281 -0.959
7 LBJ 80617529 0.954 0.002 -0.459 0.617
8 ROMNEY 115611186 0.897 0.002 -0.046 0.483
9 R.KENNEDY 214017710 0.879 0.002 -0.503 0.066
10 MUSKIE 137014832 0.908 0.002 -0.620 -0.073
11 AGNEW 131313696 0.904 0.002 0.514 0.311
12 LEMAY 105114643 0.928 0.002 0.708 0.005
1 1 3 7 1 10 2 0.667 0.438 0.605 0.797
2 2 4 5 2 8 4 0.500 0.089 -0.266 -0.964
3 3 8 4 1 9 3 0.750 0.401 0.346 0.938
4 4 3 8 3 1 11 0.000 -0.591 0.993 0.115
5 5 5 7 2 3 9 0.600 -0.177 0.175 0.985
6 6 3 9 0 3 9 1.000 -0.270 0.475 0.880
7 7 4 8 0 8 4 1.000 0.292 0.884 -0.467
etc etc etc
Use R to plot the 12 candidates in two dimensions.
This plot should be very similar to the one
you did for question 2 of homework 5
and question 3 of homework 7.
"Roll Call 1-2" "Roll Call 1-3" "Roll Call 2-3"
WALLACE ? ? ?
HUMPHREY ? ? ?
NIXON ? ? ?
MCCARTHY ? ? ?
REAGAN ? ? ?
ROCKEFELLER ? ? ?
LBJ ? ? ?
ROMNEY ? ? ?
R.KENNEDY ? ? ?
MUSKIE ? ? ?
AGNEW ? ? ?
LEMAY ? ? ?
Although there are 212 or 4,096 possible voting patterns for
the 1968 candidate configuration,
not all of these are consistent with the configuration in two dimensions!
Give an example of a pattern that is impossible given the 1968
configuration in two dimensions.
"Roll Call 1-2" "Roll Call 1-3" "Roll Call 2-3"
CLINTON ? ? ?
GORE ? ? ?
BUSH ? ? ?
BUCHANAN ? ? ?
NADER ? ? ?
MCCAIN ? ? ?
BRADLEY ? ? ?
LIEBERMAN ? ? ?
CHENEY ? ? ?
HILLARY ? ? ?
DEMPARTY ? ? ?
REPUBPARTY ? ? ?
REFORMPTY ? ? ?
PARTIES ? ? ?
Although there are 214 or 16,384 possible voting patterns for
the 2000 candidate configuration,
not all of these are consistent with the configuration in two dimensions!
Give an example of a pattern that is impossible given the 2000
configuration in two dimensions.