LEGACY CONTENT.
If you are looking for Voteview.com, PLEASE CLICK HEREThis site is an archived version of Voteview.com archived from University of Georgia on
May 23, 2017. This point-in-time capture includes all files publicly linked on Voteview.com at that time. We provide access to this content as a service to ensure that past users of Voteview.com have access to historical files. This content will remain online until at least
January 1st, 2018. UCLA provides no warranty or guarantee of access to these files.
Weekly Update of "Common Space" DW-NOMINATE Scores
(Joint House and Senate Scaling)
Jeff Lewis, Nolan McCarty,
Keith Poole, and Howard Rosenthal
Updated 12 December 2016 [Minor update 20 December 2016] (This is the Final Release for Congresses 1 - 114.)
Beginning 1 January 2017 Jeff
Lewis (UCLA) is in charge of the NOMINATE project (now nearly 35 years old). At some point voteview.com will be assigned to a UCLA server.
This server, K7MOA.COM, will be a repository for all estimations done by Poole and Rosenthal, and Poole separately (OC, BasicSpace), from
1991 to date. Health permitting, Poole will maintain this repository until 2020. Keith Poole and Howard Rosenthal would like to thank the
countless researchers who have sent us corrections to our data base. Keith Poole will be happy to answer questions on the data and
programs of the project.
This is the thirty-first release of Weekly Common Space DW-NOMINATE scores for the House and
Senate and the eleventh for the 2nd session of the 114th Congress. The House and Senate were scaled as if
they were one legislature using the
650 Legislators who served in both
the House and Senate as "glue" (bridge observations). That is, we estimated
a single ideal point for each member of Congress based upon his/her entire record of service
in Congress. In the Poole-Rosenthal framework we used the Constant model so that
each unique legislator has the same ideal point throughout his or her career.
In order to easily update the Common Space DW-NOMINATE scores when new roll calls are cast in Congress we had to
write a new DW-NOMINATE program that required as input only the roll call matrix from Congresses 1 to 114 and the previous
Legislator and Roll Call output files for Congresses 1 - 113 from the former program. Jeff Lewis wrote a batch file
that combines PERL and Python
scripts to combine all the roll call vote matrices together and then run the program. When we have
everything completed these scores will be posted at the new voteview website at UCLA and the links below will go there
with updated numbers of roll
calls and legislators.
The New DW-NOMINATE program uses LBFGS to simultaneously estimate the roll call paraments and to simultaneously
estimate the legislator parameters. Beta and the 2nd dimension weight are estimated using the Brent local
minimization algorithm (Brent, Richard. 2002. Algorithms for Minimization Without Derivatives. New
York: Dover). Legislators and the Roll Call Midpoints are constrained to lie in the unit circle.
As of 12 December 2016 there were a total of 104,635 roll calls of which 93,727 were scalable. The number of
unique
legislators is 12,046 (this counts two new members, Evans (D-PA), and Comer (R-KY), and one former member, Hanabusa (D-HI), all
three were elected in Special Elections on 8 November 2016)
producing a total of 17,492,427 choices.
The second dimension weight is 0.4153 and Beta
is 7.6912. The correct classification is 87.42 percent with an APRE of 0.6294 and a geometric mean probability
of 0.7568.
In order to calculate distances
from these Common Space DW-NOMINATE scores you must multiply the
second dimension by the weight parameter. To calculate the choice
probabilities you must apply both the second dimension weight and
the Beta parameter. Use the Yea and Nay outcome coordinates
with considerable caution because, as we explain in Congress: A Political Economic History
of Roll Call Voting, they
are poorly identified. However, the cutting line is identified and
can be used safely.
Please note that these files contain scores for most Presidents.
For Presidents prior to Eisenhower these are based on roll calls corresponding
to Presidential requests. These roll calls were compiled by an NSF project
headed by Elaine Swift
(
Study No. 3371, Database of Congressional Historical Statistics, 1789-1989).
Many of these scores are based upon a small number
of roll calls so use them with caution!
In the files below the House Coordinates for each Congress are stacked
on top of the Senate coordinates. If you have questions or need help with
these files please send us e-mail at
jblewis_at_ucla.edu (Jeff Lewis) or
ktpoole_at_uga.edu (Keith Poole).
Please note that at the end of each Congress we will post a final set of coordinates with bootstrapped standard errors
on our Common Space DW-NOMINATE download page.
The format of the legislator files is:
1. Congress Number
2. ICPSR ID Number: 5 digit code assigned by the ICPSR as
corrected by Howard Rosenthal and myself.
3. State Code: 2 digit ICPSR State Code.
4. Congressional District Number (0 if Senate or President)
5. State Name
6. Party Code: 100 = Dem., 200 = Repub. (See PARTY3.DAT)
7. Occupancy: ICPSR Occupancy Code -- 0=only occupant; 1=1st occupant; 2=2nd occupant; etc.
8. Last Means of Attaining Office: ICPSR Attain-Office Code -- 1=general election;
2=special election; 3=elected by state legislature; 5=appointed
9. Name
10. 1st Dimension Coordinate
11. 2nd Dimension Coordinate
12. Log-Likelihood
13. Number of Votes
14. Number of Classification Errors
15. Geometric Mean Probability
The format of the roll call files is:
1. Congress Number
2. Roll Call Number
3. Log-Likelihood
4. Spread on 1st Dimension -- if the roll call was not scaled, there
5. Midpoint on 1st Dimension -- are 0.000's in all four fields
6. Spread on 2nd Dimension --
7. Midpoint on 2nd Dimension --
Legislator Estimates 1st to 114th Houses and Senates (Text File, 47,045 lines, 12 December 2016)
Legislator Estimates 1st to 114th Houses and Senates (STATA 14 File, 47,045 lines, 12 December 2016)
Legislator Estimates 1st to 114th Houses and Senates (STATA 12 File, 47,045 lines, 12 December 2016)
Legislator Estimates 1st to 114th Houses and Senates (STATA 9 File, 47,045 lines, 12 December 2016)
Legislator Estimates 1st to 114th Houses and Senates (EVIEWS 9 File, 47,045 lines, 12 December 2016)
Roll Call Estimates 1st to 114th Houses and Senates (Text File, 104,635 lines, 12 December 2016)
Roll Call Estimates 1st to 114th Houses and Senates (STATA 14 File, 104,635 lines, 12 December 2016)
Roll Call Estimates 1st to 114th Houses and Senates (STATA 12 File, 104,635 lines, 12 December 2016)
Roll Call Estimates 1st to 114th Houses and Senates (STATA 9 File, 104,635 lines, 12 December 2016)
Roll Call Estimates 1st to 114th Houses and Senates (EVIEWS 9 File, 104,635 lines, 12 December 2016)
Below is STATA output showing regressions of these new coordinates onto
the old coordinates for Congresses 1 - 113. All the
r-squares are greater than 0.95 so that the new program is producing essentially the same coordinates as
the old program. However, note that as roll calls are added (1,829 -- 2015-16, total 114th Congress) that will slightly
change the scores for
Represenatives/Senators who served in previous Congresses.
. regress dwnom1new dwnom1
Source | SS df MS Number of obs = 46,506
-------------+---------------------------------- F(1, 46504) > 99999.00
Model | 6337.23422 1 6337.23422 Prob > F = 0.0000
Residual | 15.4389598 46,504 .000331992 R-squared = 0.9976
-------------+---------------------------------- Adj R-squared = 0.9976
Total | 6352.67318 46,505 .136601939 Root MSE = .01822
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
dwnom1new | Coef. Std. Err. t P>|t| [95% Conf. Interval]
-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
dwnom1 | .9756203 .0002233 4369.04 0.000 .9751827 .976058
_cons | -.0017729 .0000845 -20.98 0.000 -.0019385 -.0016072
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
. regress dwnom2new dwnom2
Source | SS df MS Number of obs = 46,506
-------------+---------------------------------- F(1, 46504) > 99999.00
Model | 10091.1505 1 10091.1505 Prob > F = 0.0000
Residual | 250.073645 46,504 .005377465 R-squared = 0.9758
-------------+---------------------------------- Adj R-squared = 0.9758
Total | 10341.2242 46,505 .222368007 Root MSE = .07333
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
dwnom2new | Coef. Std. Err. t P>|t| [95% Conf. Interval]
-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
dwnom2 | 1.009491 .0007369 1369.88 0.000 1.008046 1.010935
_cons | .008995 .0003401 26.45 0.000 .0083284 .0096616
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
. regress spread1new spread1 if (vardum==1)
Source | SS df MS Number of obs = 92,182
-------------+---------------------------------- F(1, 92180) > 99999.00
Model | 10512.7982 1 10512.7982 Prob > F = 0.0000
Residual | 56.4450622 92,180 .000612335 R-squared = 0.9947
-------------+---------------------------------- Adj R-squared = 0.9947
Total | 10569.2432 92,181 .114657502 Root MSE = .02475
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
spread1new | Coef. Std. Err. t P>|t| [95% Conf. Interval]
-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
spread1 | 1.029077 .0002484 4143.47 0.000 1.02859 1.029564
_cons | -.0000282 .0000816 -0.35 0.730 -.000188 .0001317
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
. regress mid1new mid1 if (vardum==1)
Source | SS df MS Number of obs = 92,182
-------------+---------------------------------- F(1, 92180) > 99999.00
Model | 11859.8461 1 11859.8461 Prob > F = 0.0000
Residual | 140.163429 92,180 .001520541 R-squared = 0.9883
-------------+---------------------------------- Adj R-squared = 0.9883
Total | 12000.0095 92,181 .130178774 Root MSE = .03899
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
mid1new | Coef. Std. Err. t P>|t| [95% Conf. Interval]
-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
mid1 | .9820736 .0003516 2792.80 0.000 .9813844 .9827629
_cons | .0000695 .0001284 0.54 0.589 -.0001823 .0003212
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
. regress spread2new spread2 if (vardum==1)
Source | SS df MS Number of obs = 92,182
-------------+---------------------------------- F(1, 92180) > 99999.00
Model | 23803.1281 1 23803.1281 Prob > F = 0.0000
Residual | 1170.16423 92,180 .01269434 R-squared = 0.9531
-------------+---------------------------------- Adj R-squared = 0.9531
Total | 24973.2924 92,181 .270915833 Root MSE = .11267
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
spread2new | Coef. Std. Err. t P>|t| [95% Conf. Interval]
-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
spread2 | 1.060118 .0007742 1369.34 0.000 1.058601 1.061636
_cons | -.0007929 .0003711 -2.14 0.033 -.0015203 -.0000655
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
. regress mid2new mid2 if (vardum==1)
Source | SS df MS Number of obs = 92,182
-------------+---------------------------------- F(1, 92180) > 99999.00
Model | 29244.8144 1 29244.8144 Prob > F = 0.0000
Residual | 318.065259 92,180 .00345048 R-squared = 0.9892
-------------+---------------------------------- Adj R-squared = 0.9892
Total | 29562.8796 92,181 .320704696 Root MSE = .05874
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
mid2new | Coef. Std. Err. t P>|t| [95% Conf. Interval]
-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
mid2 | .9959004 .0003421 2911.28 0.000 .99523 .9965709
_cons | -.0001018 .0001935 -0.53 0.599 -.0004811 .0002775
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
VOTEVIEW Blog
NOMINATE Data, Roll Call Data, and Software
Course Web Pages: University of Georgia (2010 - )
Course Web Pages: UC San Diego (2004 - 2010)
University of San Diego Law School (2005)
Course Web Pages: University of Houston (2000 - 2005)
Course Web Pages: Carnegie-Mellon University (1997 - 2000)
Analyzing Spatial Models of Choice and Judgment with R
Spatial Models of Parliamentary Voting
Recent Working Papers
Analyses of Recent Politics
About This Website
K7MOA Log Books: 1960 - 2017
Bio of Keith T. Poole
Related Links